Project Gate System
UX Case Study of a project process application

Project Gate System
UX Case Study of a project process application

Project Overview

Project Gate System provides guidance for conducting the planning, development, and execution activities over the life cycle of surface facilities capital projects. Implementation of the PGS Process will ensure continued alignment of the capital projects with the company's strategic, financial, and operational requirements. The activities undertaken during each PGS Process Stage will depend upon the nature of the business need or opportunity with respect to the stakeholders, project size and complexity, project execution and risks, project cost and delivery timeline, etc.

Team: 1 Designer, 6 Developers, 1 Business analyst, 1 QA Analyst and 1 Product manager.

Time: 4 months, full-time

Project Overview

Project Gate System provides guidance for conducting the planning, development, and execution activities over the life cycle of surface facilities capital projects. Implementation of the PGS Process will ensure continued alignment of the capital projects with the company's strategic, financial, and operational requirements. The activities undertaken during each PGS Process Stage will depend upon the nature of the business need or opportunity with respect to the stakeholders, project size and complexity, project execution and risks, project cost and delivery timeline, etc.

Team: 1 Designer, 6 Developers, 1 Business analyst, 1 QA Analyst and 1 Product manager.

Time: 4 months, full-time

Objective

Despite having an existing process, most of the work in KOC was done manually using hand-written notes or printouts. KOC had worked with consulting agencies in the past to solve this problem, but nothing worked.

Our objective for the PGS was to:


- Find why user-preferred paper over software

- Optimize the workflow

- Eliminate manual labour
- Reduce carbon footprint


Benefits

The PGS Process stage gate approach and focus on FEL will optimize the utilization of company resources and will provide opportunities to incorporate value enhancements in the capital projects. The decisions made at the end of each Process Stage will be based on the results of the work conducted during that Stage.

- Achieving the Process Stage objectives with a high degree of quality

in the work performed.

- ·Maintaining a focus on stakeholder involvement and engagement

in the planning and development activities and preparation of

deliverables.

- Managing project uncertainties and project execution risks in a

timely and effective manner.

- ·Reducing the need for scope changes and rework in the future

Process Stages.

- ·Another major benefit of the PGS Process will be improving the

accuracy of the cost estimates through better capital project

definition.

Objective


Despite having an existing process, most of the work in KOC was done manually using hand-written notes or printouts. KOC had worked with consulting agencies in the past to solve this problem, but nothing worked.


Our objective for the PGS was to:

- Find why user-preferred paper

over software

- Optimize the workflow

- Eliminate manual labour
- Reduce carbon footprint

The PGS Process stage gate approach and focus on FEL will optimize the utilization of company resources and will provide opportunities to incorporate value enhancements in the capital projects. The decisions made at the end of each Process Stage will be based on the results of the work conducted during that Stage.

- Achieving the Process

Stage objectives with a

high degree of quality

in the work performed.

- ·Maintaining a focus on

stakeholder involvement

and engagement in the

planning and

development activities

and preparation of

deliverables.

- Managing project

uncertainties and project

execution risks in a

timely and effective

manner.

- Reducing the need for

scope changes and

rework in the future

Process Stages.

- Another major benefit of

the PGS Process will be

improving the accuracy of

the cost estimates

through better capital

project definition.

The PGS Process stage gate approach and focus on FEL will optimize the utilization of company resources and will provide opportunities to incorporate value enhancements in the capital projects. The decisions made at the end of each Process Stage will be based on the results of the work conducted during that Stage.

- Achieving the Process Stage

objectives with a high degree

of quality in the work

performed.

- ·Maintaining a focus on

stakeholder involvement

and engagement in the

planning and development

activities and preparation of

deliverables.

- Managing project uncertainties

and project execution risks in a

timely and effective manner.

- Reducing the need for

scope changes and

rework in the future

Process Stages.

- Another major benefit of

the PGS Process will be

improving the accuracy of

the cost estimates

through better capital

project definition.

Benefits

My role
As I started working on the project as a sole contributor. I had some research and workflows done by the

previous agencies. But, initially, my role was to run the entire design cycle from discovery to delivery. Post MVP,

when the client’s trust was with us, we had two additional hands on deck, a UI designer and a UX designer.


As I started working on the project as a sole contributor. I had some research and workflows done by the

previous agencies. But, initially, my role was to run the entire design cycle from discovery to delivery. Post MVP,

when the client’s trust was with us, we had two additional hands on deck, a UI designer and a UX designer.

As I started working on the project as a sole contributor. I had some research and workflows done by the

previous agencies. But, initially, my role was to run the entire design cycle from discovery to delivery. Post MVP,

when the client’s trust was with us, we had two additional hands on deck, a UI designer and a UX designer.

My role


Design Process

In order to collaborate with stakeholders and users, we conducted a Design Thinking workshop. Assess the needs and pain points of each member of the group so that business challenges can be addressed. In order to explore issues more widely

Design Process


In order to collaborate with stakeholders and users, we conducted a Design Thinking workshop. Assess the needs and pain points of each member of the group so that business challenges can be addressed. In order to explore issues more widely

1. RESEARCH

1.1 Key user pain points

- Duplicate applications in the system consume a lot of time to sort.
- While processing an application, required documents are not available in the system.
- Managers do not balance the workload evenly among employees.
- We need to call the different department or vendor multiple times for missing information

and documents.

1.2 Key business pain points

- There are too many applications in the backlog.
- There is no way to prioritize applications and identify critical ones .
- Due to multiple software used by each department, maintenance cost is very high.
- Employees do not respect the SLAs.
- There is no way to analyze team performance.

1.3 My observations

- Navigation and page load is a pain. To view the details of an application, users had to -

switch between 3-4 applications, navigate through 15 different pages, while each page

took ~2 mins to load. Processing an application required entering details at various stages,

which was too painful due to similar reasons as above.
- Waiting for missing documents: Due to the unavailability of information, users spend most

of their time calling other team or vendor to collect missing documents. From the time of

intimation to the citizens to the user getting the document, it can take 15–45 days.

1.1 Key user pain points

- Duplicate applications in the

system consume a lot of time to

sort.
- While processing an application,

required documents are not

available in the system.
- Managers do not balance the

workload evenly among

employees.
- We need to call the different

department or vendor multiple

times for missing information

and documents.


1.2 Key business pain points

- There are too many applications

in the backlog.
- There is no way to prioritize

applications and identify critical

ones

- Due to multiple software used

by each department,

maintenance cost is very high.
- Employees do not respect the

SLAs.
- There is no way to analyze team

performance.


1.3 My observations

- Navigation and page load is a

pain. To view the details of an

application, users had to

switch between 3-4 applications,

navigate through 15 different

pages, while each page took ~2

mins to load. Processing an

application required entering

details at various stages, which

was too painful due to similar

reasons as above.
- Waiting for missing documents:

Due to the unavailability of

information, users spend most

of their time calling other team

or vendor to collect missing

documents. From the time of

intimation to the citizens to the

user getting the document, it

can take 15–45 days.

1. RESEARCH

2. DEFINE

2.1 Problem statements

- I am an manager from the Program Administration department
- I am trying to process a Program Administration aid request
- But I need to put the application on hold
- Because I do not have the required information and the system is too slow

2.2 UX guidelines

Based on the research, we came up with the following guidelines that we referred to every

time we came up with a design or solution.

- Simplify the workflow
- Create a consistent experience across applications
- Ensure system status visibility
- Do not define the process in stone; give the users some flexibility
- Design for faster performance
- Offer users the ability to set their preferences
- UX over UI design.

2. DEFINE


2.1 Problem statements

- Currently, the procurement

procedure is complex and

insufficient to meet the

business's priorities and

expectations.

- It is currently unclear how the

vendor ecosystem is maintained

within the organisation.

- Finding valid information

requires considerable time and

manual effort and does not

appear to be intuitive.

- To derive meaningful insights

into the overall performance, the

procurement team lacks access to

a 360- degree view of all the data

and tools.

- Slow processing times and

duplicate inputs and

unpredictable wait times for

different approvals were sinking

costs and precious time.


2.2 UX guidelines

Based on the research, we came up with the following guidelines that we referred to every time we came up with a design or solution.

- Simplify the workflow

- Create a consistent experience

across applications

- Ensure system status visibility

- Design for faster performance

- Offer users the ability to set their

preferences

2.1 Problem statements

- I am an manager from the

Program Administration

department
- I am trying to process a Program

Administration aid request
- But I need to put the application

on hold
- Because I do not have the

required information and the

system is too slow


2.2 UX guidelines

Based on the research, we came up with the following guidelines that we referred to every time we came up with a design or solution.

- Simplify the workflow
- Create a consistent experience

across applications
- Ensure system status visibility
- Do not define the process in

stone; give the users some

flexibility
- Design for faster performance
- Offer users the ability to set their

preferences
- UX over UI design.

2.3 User persona

Based on my research I have identified some user types and I have created a user persona that guided me to make better design decisions

2.3 User persona

Based on my research I have identified some user types and I have created a user persona that guided me to make better design decisions

2.4 Setting the success metrics

- Reduce time taken to respond to within
- Reduce time taken to Start the process
- Reduce carbon footprint
- Reduce time spent on calls with stakeholder and vendor
- Reduce manager’s workload
- Increase availability of data in the system
- Increase number of applications processed per day
- Increase morale of employees and managers
- Increase adoption and retention rate of the new system
- Increase quantitative visibility of team’s performance
- Increase Employee happiness index

2.4 Setting the success metrics

- Reduce time taken to respond to

within
- Reduce time taken to Start the

process
- Reduce carbon footprint
- Reduce time spent on calls with

stakeholder and vendor
- Reduce manager’s workload
- Increase availability of data in the

system
- Increase number of applications

processed per day
- Increase morale of employees

and managers
- Increase adoption and retention

rate of the new system
- Increase quantitative visibility of

team’s performance
- Increase Employee happiness

index

3.2 User flow

User flow helps us to understand how the target user will travel through the application to complete a specific task.

3.2 User flow

User flow helps us to understand how the target user will travel through the application to complete a specific task.

3. IDEATION

3.1 Information Architecture

Information architecture aims at organising structure so that users would easily adapt to the functionality of the product and could find everything they

need without too much effort.


3. IDEATION

3.1 Information Architecture

Information architecture aims at organising structure so that users would easily adapt to the functionality of the product and could find everything they need without too much effort.


Key ideas to improve the employee’s productivity

- Assignment of application priority during registration (Normal, Urgent)
- Predictive scoring of approval/rejection of application
- Inter-department request assignments and chat messenger
- Integration of 8 desktop app APIs into 1 single screen
- Dashboard key information and pending items

Key ideas to improve the leader’s productivity

- Auto assignment of request based on employee-request type configuration
- Dashboard to track team and request performance
- Gamified leadership boards and rewards for the managers whose team performs the best.

Key ideas to improve data availability

- Vendor self-service portal
- Special department to manage incomplete requests
- Data partnership with other Govt. entities
- Image to text processing software

Key ideas to improve the employee’s productivity

- Assignment of request priority

during registration (Normal,

Urgent)

- Predictive scoring of approval/

rejection of the request

- Inter-department request

assignments and

communication

- Integration of 6 application data

into 1 single screen

- Dashboard key information and

pending items

Key ideas to improve the leader’s productivity

- Auto assignment of request

based on employee-request

type configuration

- Dashboard to track team and

request performance

Key ideas to improve data availability

- Special Section to manage

incomplete requests

- Data partnership with vendor

entities

- Image-to-text processing

software integration

Key ideas to improve the employee’s productivity

- Assignment of application

priority during registration

(Normal, Urgent)
- Predictive scoring of

approval/rejection of application
- Inter-department request

assignments and chat

messenger
- Integration of 8 desktop app

APIs into 1 single screen
- Dashboard key information and

pending items

Key ideas to improve the leader’s productivity

- Auto assignment of request

based on employee-request

type configuration
- Dashboard to track team and

request performance
- Gamified leadership boards and

rewards for the managers

whose team performs the best.

Key ideas to improve data availability

- Vendor self-service portal
- Special department to manage

incomplete requests
- Data partnership with other

Govt. entities
- Image to text processing

software

4. DESIGN

4.1 Low- Fidelity Wireframe


4. DESIGN

4.1 Low-Fidelity Wireframe


4.2 High- Fidelity Wireframe

4.2 High- Fidelity Wireframe

5. TESTING

5.1 Post-design, we conducted multiple usability sessions

- We reserved 30mins every day with a new person in each department for feedback on

designs.
- Post-staging deployment, we spent the next day in UAT and usability testing with 2 users

from each department.
- Post-production deployment, we spent the next day training users on the new features

and workflows.
- If we missed something in the new system or there was a bug, we keep the old system

running so that the users are not blocked.
- We made app ambassadors in each department. These employees understood the

system the most and were the go-to person for all questions the other employees might

have related to the new app.


5.2 Evaluating the success metrics

- Reduced the time taken to respond within each department by 45%.
- Reduced the time taken to close a request by 60%.
- Reduced carbon footprint by 75%.
- Reduced time spent on calls with stakeholder and Vendors (qualitative analysis).
- Reduced the manager’s workload by automating his entire workflow.
- Increased the availability of data in the system by 94%.
- Increased quantitative visibility of team’s performance by supporting dashboard and

other metrics.

5. TESTING


5.1 Post-design, we conducted multiple usability sessions

Few highlights of this phase:

- We scheduled a 30-minute

meeting with a new employee in

each department every day to

get feedback on designs.

- Immediately following the

production deployment, we

trained users on the new

features and workflows.

- We keep the old system running

if there is a bug or something is

missed in the new system.

- After the interview, these users

were recorded and played in

order to pinpoint any specific

issues they encountered. The

findings of the usability session

were fantastic. After this session,

we got some helpful feedback

and retouched the interface

designs.


5.2 Evaluating the success metrics

- Reduced the time taken to

respond to a requester by 40%.

- Reduced the time taken to close

a request by 65%.

- Reduced time spent on calls with

requester and vendor

(qualitative analysis).

- Reduced the manager’s

workload by automating his

entire workflow.

- Increased the availability of data

in the system by 94%.

- Increase the number of requests

processed per day. 95% request

were processed the same day.

Additionally, there was a

reduction in the backlog by 10%

per week.

5.1 Post-design, we conducted multiple usability sessions

- We reserved 30mins every day

with a new person in each

department for feedback on

designs.
- Post-staging deployment, we

spent the next day in UAT and

usability testing with 2 users

from each department.
- Post-production deployment, we

spent the next day training users

on the new features

and workflows.
- If we missed something in the

new system or there was a bug,

we keep the old system

running so that the users are not

blocked.
- We made app ambassadors in

each department. These

employees understood the

system the most and were the

go-to person for all questions

the other employees might

have related to the new app.

5.2 Evaluating the success metrics

- Reduced the time taken to

respond within each department

by 45%.
- Reduced the time taken to close

a request by 60%.
- Reduced carbon footprint by

75%.
- Reduced time spent on calls with

stakeholder and Vendors

(qualitative analysis).
- Reduced the manager’s

workload by automating his

entire workflow.
- Increased the availability of data

in the system by 94%.
- Increased quantitative visibility

of team’s performance by

supporting dashboard and

other metrics.

Takeaways

- Process automation and structured approvals for every user across different teams,

departments

- Predictable workflows and centralized communication help improve the quality and speed

of deployment for the process and services you need

- Automate time-intensive and error-prone manual processes and speed up Gate Process

cycle times

- Give your organisation real-time visibility into spending so you can make better budget

decisions

- Gain real-time visibility into budgets to encourage more proactive spending management

- Project Gate System gives you complete visibility and control over your end-to-end Gate

process

- Make purchasing and accounts

payable easier and more error-

prone by automating manual

processes

- Manage spending responsibly

by improving workflows and

implementing structured

approvals across departments,

teams, and locations

- Give your organisation real-

time visibility into spending so

you can make better budget

decisions

- Get a full understanding of

your budget and empower

your managers to understand

why each request is being

made

- Get the best deals from

preferred vendors by

leveraging data

- Process automation and

structured approvals for every

user across different teams,

departments

- Predictable workflows and

centralized communication

help improve the quality and

speed of deployment for the

process and services you need

- Automate time-intensive and

error-prone manual processes

and speed up Gate Process

cycle times

- Give your organisation real-

time visibility into spending so

you can make better budget

decisions

- Gain real-time visibility into

budgets to encourage more

proactive spending

management

- Project Gate System gives you

complete visibility and control

over your end-to-end Gate

process

Takeaways

© www.sreevas.net